are thesis narrative should include snappy but almost always stupid. Grahams hierarchy is useful for its intended purpose, but it isnt really a hierarchy of disagreements. I think the high-level generators might work the same way. I think easily 90 of online discussion is of this form right now, including some long and carefully-written thinkpieces with lots of citations. The shorter and more public the medium, the more pressure there is to stick to the lower levels. Sometimes these studies are just wrong. Part of what makes this experience rewarding is learning something new. In retrospect, these are probably why the disagreement arose in the first place, with a lot of the more specific points being downstream of them and kind of made-up justifications.
If you admit that the data are mixed but seem to slightly favor your side, and your opponent says that every good study ever has always favored his side plus also you are a racist communist well, you kind of walked into that one. First, correlation isnt causation the UKs low murder rates might not be caused by their gun control, and maybe not all communist countries inevitably end up like the ussr. First, because if you do it right youll end up respecting the other person. They just have to focus on crime and thats the sort of thing which at least in principle is tractable to studies and statistics and scientific consensus. When I say the Soviet Union was communist, I mean that the state controlled basically all of the economy. 50 Topic Ideas for Argument Essays. If you see an attempt at social shaming and feel triggered, thats the second-best result from the perspective of the person who put. First, because people will feel compelled to refute the low-level point before continuing.